Black Truffle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tractor Rake #3908
    Fran Angerer
    Participant
      Up
      0
      Down
      ::

      I am using it to clear rocks from the new planting area and it saved a lot of back breaking labor. I have a good video of it in use if I could post it working.

      in reply to: Tree Spacing #4526
      Fran Angerer
      Participant
        Up
        0
        Down
        ::

        A grower in Idaho has planted trees in close proximity that resemble hedgerows. The density of the growth makes harvesting with dogs very difficult.

        T.Mel requires open canopy so it is not recommended.

        in reply to: Giant Black Truffle Goes Up For Sale Via NFT Auction #7809
        Fran Angerer
        Participant
          Up
          0
          Down
          ::

          So how big do they claim this truffle is?

          If it is 1265 grams/44.7 ounces or 2.79 pounds. It sure does not seem that big sitting next to that egg.

          in reply to: Giant Black Truffle Goes Up For Sale Via NFT Auction #7824
          Fran Angerer
          Participant
            Up
            0
            Down
            ::

            It was indeed 2.79 pounds. Holy Moley, thats one big truffle!!!!

            in reply to: Subsoiling – Soil Compaction #8599
            Fran Angerer
            Participant
              Up
              0
              Down
              ::

              Ruth,

              I would suggest digging a hole about 4 feet deep with an excavator and looking at your soil profile before ripping deep. You may not need to rip deep if your profile shows no signs of compaction or hardpan that would prevent draining.

               

              Fran Angerer

              in reply to: Soil Horizons: A Short Story #9228
              Fran Angerer
              Participant
                Up
                0
                Down
                ::

                How long did it take for the water to perc through the hole. If it dissipates within a day or two that would be an indication of drainage and would be a good indication.

                in reply to: Vacuum sealed #9605
                Fran Angerer
                Participant
                  Up
                  0
                  Down
                  ::

                  This information is from USDA. Note that it says:

                  “Thus, perishable foods must be kept either in the refrigerator at or below 40 °F, or in the freezer at 0 °F.”

                  Not necessarily an answer but a caveat that implies if kept below 40 degrees it would be okay.

                  KNOWLEDGE ARTICLE
                  Vacuum packaging removes air from food packages. Some pathogenic bacteria, such as Clostridium botulinum which causes the deadly botulism poisoning, prefer low-oxygen environments and reproduce well in vacuum-packaged foods. Thus, perishable foods must be kept either in the refrigerator at or below 40 °F, or in the freezer at 0 °F. Vacuum packaging may extend the storage time of refrigerated foods, dried foods and frozen foods, but it is not a substitute for safely processing perishable foods to be stored at room temperature, such as canning or dehydrating. Use refrigerated, vacuum-packaged meat and poultry within a few days, or by the manufacturer’s recommended use-by date.

                  in reply to: Supply #10645
                  Fran Angerer
                  Participant
                    Up
                    0
                    Down
                    ::

                    I was required to file forms and get an importers number with the USDA to import truffles from Croatia.

                    As far as buying truffles to use as inoculant, be advised that it is recommended to verify type of truffles with DNA testing before using as inoculant.

                     

                    in reply to: Supply #10684
                    Fran Angerer
                    Participant
                      Up
                      0
                      Down
                      ::

                      Customs form 5106

                      Fran Angerer
                      Participant
                        Up
                        0
                        Down
                        ::

                        Ken,

                        Thank you for posting this information.

                         

                        Fran Angerer

                      Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

                      21 comments

                      • Fran Angerer

                        What was the outcome of this grant?

                        • Staci O'Toole

                          Hi Fran.
                          If you click on the title it will take you to the details regarding the grant and it’s outcome.
                          The Primaries were Jeannine Davis and Inga Meadows. Although the research task force was not established yet there is quite a bit of information and details. If I remember correctly it helped establish their lab at NC State

                      • Alex Poole

                        Great overview

                      • Holly Martin

                        Would have been nice to have an end time on Sunday for booking travel

                      • Jeffrey Coker

                        1. This proposal is almost verbatim the UNECE Standard FFV-53 with some added (somewhat complicating) language about the percentages of classes that can be exposed by trimming and a couple of other things. Why not just endorse the UNECE standards and prevent the confusion of having yet another set of standards? [In our case at Burwell Farms, we are also being inspected by the state of NC and following both state and USDA food safety and packaging rules.]

                        2. The stated purpose of the proposal is to “standardize the quality requirements for use of the NATGA logo”. Is logo use currently a problem? Are we talking about use of the NATGA logo only on food packaging, or also on grower websites? If a grower chooses not to use NATGA’s class system, then should they remove the NATGA logo from all their materials?

                      • Holly Martin

                        Species: Since both T. Gibbosum and T. Oregonense are described as Oregon White Truffle, it might be useful to include seasonal designation, i.e. Oregon White Truffle (Spring) for T. Gibbosum and Oregon White Truffle (Winter) for T. Oregonense.

                        II.C (iv): This is just a drafting suggestion. I found the second sentence, as organized, a little hard to follow. My suggested text has all the same information, just reorganized: Provided the truffles retain their essential characteristics as regards the quality, the keep quality and presentation, the following defects may be allowed: defects in shape, defects in development, defects in coloring, superficial bruising, and slight superficial damages caused by pests.

                        Over all, nice job and thanks for all the good work!

                      • Karen Passafaro

                        I would add a few pictures of what you are recommending with packaging and labels

                      • A

                        I like the Identification requirement. Now do those classification apply to a member of NATGA importing and reselling truffles? What then should be done with identification?

                      • A

                        I never heard of the Icon class, interesting

                      • A

                        Weight and shape characterizations do not apply uniformly across species. It looks like the document is centered around T. melanosporum. It would be a great challenge to find a 300g oregon truffle… another example is that Tuber magnatum is rarely round.

                      • A

                        In Definition of Produce we say “species of the the genus Tuber” yet in the list of truffles below we proceed to include Oregon truffles which are not of the Tuber genus. I would be in favor of changing the definition of truffle to say what is in Wikipedia:

                        “A truffle is the fruiting body of a subterranean ascomycete fungus, predominantly one of the many species of the genus Tuber.”

                        Or if we want to be less scientific we could say:

                        “A truffle is the fruiting body of a subterranean fungus, predominantly one of the many species of the genus Tuber.”

                      • A

                        Note: From time to time the sound of this video is distorted for a few seconds at a time. This is a problem with the original recording and is not a problem with your system. Thank you for your understanding.

                      • A

                        Please use the dedicated forum to discuss and ask questions about this webinar.

                      • Bryan Denig

                        Such a great webinar from Christine. I am very appreciative that the webinar recordings are being posted for those of us who are interested but unable to attend live. Looking forward to the others!

                      • Raymond and Bernadine Prince

                        please put Raymond on your list of participants for the Webinar

                      • A

                        Feel Free to submit questions or comments about this webinar using the comment feature of this page.

                      • A

                        Feel Free to submit questions or comments about this webinar using the comment feature of this page.